The human mind works best in the presence of appreciation.
In life we learn that to be appreciative is to be naïve, whereas to be critical is to be realistic.
In discussions, therefore, we focus first, and sometimes only, on things that are not working. Consequently, because the brain requires appreciation to work well, our thinking is often specious.
The Thinking Environment recognises the right ratio of appreciation to challenge so that individuals and groups can think at their best.


To create a full Thinking Environment, all components need to be present. When the Thinking Environment is not what it should be, here are some things to look out for when it comes to Appreciation.
Is the ratio of Appreciation to criticism at least 5:1?
When something goes wrong, do we look for someone to blame or do we regard it as a learning opportunity?
Are we giving each other high-quality Attention?
Are we assuming that giving Appreciation is naïve/soft? If so, do we think that is true? Could we assume something more positive?
If there is too little Appreciation, how can you increase it? When can you tell the important people in your life and working life what you appreciate about them? Are there opportunities when you meet, round the dinner table or at the beginning and end of meetings?